| 20188957 |
de M Ochs S, Fasciotti M, Barreto RP, de Figueiredo NG, Albuquerque FC, Massa MC, Gabardo I, Pereira Netto AD: Optimization and comparison of HPLC and RRLC conditions for the analysis of carbonyl-DNPH derivatives. Talanta. 2010 Apr 15;81(1-2):521-9. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
Analytical conditions for the analysis of 15 carbonyl-DNPH derivatives were optimized and compared by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and rapid resolution liquid chromatography (RRLC). Binary, ternary and quaternary mixtures of acetonitrile, isopropanol, methanol, tetrahydrofuran and water were evaluated under RRLC conditions employing a Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 (50 mm x 4.6 mm x 1.8 microm) column and a Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 (50 mm x 2.1 mm x 1.8 microm) column. The optimized conditions obtained employing the two RRLC columns were compared with those obtained using a Supelcosil C18 (250 mm x 4.6 mm x 5 microm; Supelco) that is designed for HPLC separation of DNPH derivatives. Chromatograms run with a Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 (50 mm x 2.1 mm x 1.8 microm) column and a mobile phase composed of isopropanol, methanol, tetrahydrofuran and water led to the best separation conditions considering reduced analysis time (approximately 6 min per run), solvent consumption rate (approximately 2 mL per run) and resolution of propanone, acrolein and propionaldehyde hydrazones. Quantification limits and linear ranges were adequate for direct application of EPA TO-11 conditions in all sets of RRLC and HPLC conditions. The analytical method was applied in the determination of carbonyl compounds (CCs) in Niteroi City, RJ, Brazil in samples that were collected during periods of 2h. Formaldehyde (8.22-9.78 ppbv) predominated in all periods followed by acetaldehyde (1.77-3.99ppbv) and propanone (1.89-3.26 ppbv). Heavy CCs such as butyraldehyde and benzaldehyde were also detected in most samples. Total CCs varied along the studied day. The obtained results showed that RRLC can be applied to CCs determination without any change in the conditions of sample preparation of the Method EPA TO-11. |
33(0,1,1,3) |