Protein Information

ID 440
Name Cl 2
Synonyms AMB11; MHC class I NK cell receptor; CD158E1; CD158E1/2; CD158E2; CL 11; CL 2; HLA BW4 specific inhibitory NK cell receptor…

Compound Information

ID 730
Name OCH
CAS 2,3,4,4,5,5,6,6-octachloro-2-cyclohexen-1-one

Reference

PubMed Abstract RScore(About this table)
16257689 de Oliveira PR, Rittner R: 1,3-Diaxial steric effects and intramolecular hydrogen bonding in the conformational equilibria of new cis-1,3-disubstituted cyclohexanes using low temperature NMR spectra and theoretical calculations. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2005 Nov;62(1-3):30-7.
The conformational equilibria of 3-X-cyclohexanol [X=F (1), Cl (2), Br (3), I (4), Me (5), NMe (2) (6) and MeO (7)] and of 3-X-methoxycyclohexane [X=F (8), Cl (9), Br (10), I (11), Me (12), NMe (2) (13) and MeO (14)] cis isomers were determined from low temperature NMR spectra and PCMODEL calculated coupling constants. The energy differences between aa and ee conformers were obtained from these data (DeltaG (J)(av) and DeltaG (PC)(av), respectively) and also by the additivity principle from data for the monosubstituted cyclohexanes (DeltaG (Ad)). H-1 and H-3 hydrogen vicinal coupling constants and DeltaG (J)(av) values showed that the diequatorial conformer is predominant in the conformational equilibrium of the compounds studied at low temperature. However, DeltaG (PC)(av) data show that compounds 6 and 7 constitute an exception, since they are almost equally populated by ee and aa at room temperature, due to stabilization of their aa conformer by an intramolecular hydrogen bond. DeltaG (Ad) values, obtained according to the additivity principle, show a better agreement for compounds 2 and 3, since the 1,3-diaxial steric effect is counterbalanced by the formation of an intramolecular hydrogen bond (IAHB). For the remaining compounds, DeltaG (Ad) values underestimate the energy differences, since the 1,3-diaxial steric effect, between X and OH or OCH (3), is absent in the monosubstituted compounds used as references. Moreover, the DeltaG (PC)(av), calculated from the coupling constants, obtained through the PCMODEL program, are rather smaller than the DeltaG (J)(av) values, since the program does not have parameters for the effect, observed in this report, of a substituent at gamma position on coupling constants values for the hydrogen under consideration.
1(0,0,0,1)