| 15820780 |
Dube J, Girouard J, Leclerc P, Douville P: Problems with the estimation of urine protein by automated assays. Clin Biochem. 2005 May;38(5):479-85.
OBJECTIVES: Most clinical laboratories replaced their manual precipitation techniques for the determination of urinary protein with automated dye binding assays or benzethonium chloride-turbidimetric assays. Few studies have validated these assays for the measurement of urinary proteins in the normal range. DESIGN AND METHODS: This study compares four automated assays for the measurement of urinary protein to a manual Ponceau S/TCA precipitation assay. We evaluated the linearity, the precision, the analytical sensitivity, the accuracy and the recovery of different proteins for each assay. RESULTS: All assays showed good linearity with the theoretical concentration of albumin present in the sample. The coefficient of variation was below 10% at a concentration of 0.142 g/L. However, the manual Ponceau S/TCA assay demonstrated superior analytical sensitivity. Accuracy determinations showed a variable positive bias and poor correlations at concentrations below 0.1 g/L when compared to the Ponceau S/TCA assay. Small molecular weight peptides particularly affected the pyrogallol red assays but other urinary components also interfered with the automated assays. CONCLUSIONS: Most automated assays show high imprecision and poor accuracy for the measurement of urinary protein in the normal range. The Ponceau S/TCA offers a precise and accurate manual alternative to these automated assays. |
1(0,0,0,1) |