Protein Information

ID 1175
Name protein tyrosine phosphatase
Synonyms DUSP16; DUSP16 protein; Dual specificity phosphatase 16; Dual specificity protein phosphatase 16; MAP kinase phosphatase 7; MAPK phosphatase 7; MKP 7; MKP7…

Compound Information

ID 1689
Name IAA
CAS

Reference

PubMed Abstract RScore(About this table)
11683397 Valdez SN, Sica MP, Labovsky V, Iacono RF, Cardoso AL, Krochik AG, Mazza CS, Ermacora MR, Cedola N, Poskus E: Combined measurement of diabetes mellitus immunological markers: an assessment of its benefits in adult-onset patients. Autoimmunity. 2001;33(4):227-36.
The convenience of combining the measurement of antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA), protein tyrosine phosphatase (IA-2A), and autoantibodies to insulin (IAA) in diabetic patients was assessed. We analysed 71 type 1 and 115 adult-onset diabetic patients. The latter were grouped into three categories according to the time of evolution to insulin dependence. The main findings were as follows: (i) in type 1 diabetes, the combined analysis of GADA and IA-2A showed a sensitivity of 87.4% and was not appreciably improved by adding IAA; (ii) out of 31 adults who required insulin immediately or within the first two years of diagnosis, 41.9, 29.0, and 6.5% were positive for at least one, two or all three, and all three markers, respectively; GADA was the most prevalent (35.5%) and IA-2A the least represented (16.1%); (iii) 34 adult patients with slow evolution to insulin dependence showed a completely different profile: 5.9% were GADA positive and 23.5% were IAA positive and no double or triple positivity was observed as all patients were IA-2A negative; and (iv) 50 type 2 patients who had not required insulin treatment showed a low incidence of GADA (4%) as the only marker present. We conclude that a combined double-antigen test for GADA and IA-2A is a useful strategy for prospective screening of type 1 diabetes. However, in adults, the profile of individual markers discloses the course to insulin dependence. Therefore, it seems advisable to measure the markers separately, to allow a better classification of these patients, and help define their treatment.
1(0,0,0,1)